home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=93TT0116>
- <title>
- Oct. 25, 1993: Reviews:Cinema
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1993
- Oct. 25, 1993 All The Rage:Angry Young Rockers
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- REVIEWS, Page 80
- Cinema
- "Who Will Go With Me!"
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>By RICHARD SCHICKEL
- </p>
- <list> TITLE: Gettysburg
- WRITER-DIRECTOR: Ronald F. Maxwell
- </list>
- <p> THE BOTTOM LINE: That cinematic rarity, an intelligent epic,
- reanimates one of history's crucial, tragic moments.
- </p>
- <p> There are three compelling reasons to see Gettysburg. The first
- is General Robert E. Lee, the second is Colonel Joshua Lawrence
- Chamberlain, and the last is Brigadier General Lewis Armistead.
- They don't embrace all the contortions imposed on the human
- spirit by the military necessity, but they'll do for a potent,
- dramatic start. And their existence as well-drawn figures amid
- the hubbub of a four-hour epic speaks well for writer-director
- Ronald Maxwell's sober intentions and very creditable achievements
- in this film.
- </p>
- <p> Of the three, Martin Sheen's Lee is the most startling. In our
- folklore (and in the hearts of his troops) the Confederate leader
- has been granted near saintly status. Sheen gives us the dark
- side of the holy warrior, a man of courtly manners who is possessed
- by a vision of a vainglorious, straight-ahead assault on the
- enemy's center--the vision that produced Pickett's disastrous
- charge. It was a course of action that defied reason (personified
- here by Lieutenant General James Longstreet, who is underwritten
- and underplayed by Tom Berenger).
- </p>
- <p> Lee's opposite number in the film's dramatic scheme is Colonel
- Chamberlain, commander of a ravaged regiment assigned to defend
- the Union flank on the hill known as Little Round Top. A college
- professor and, as played by Jeff Daniels, a soft-spoken humanist-idealist,
- he is democratic man at his best. And a commander of steely
- resolve. Almost out of ammunition, unable to withstand another
- Confederate charge, he mounts a bayonet assault of his own,
- downhill and through heavy woods (in the film's best combat
- sequence).
- </p>
- <p> Finally, there is the late Richard Jordan's Armistead, the film's
- great romantic, haunted by the fact that he must meet his best
- friend in battle--haunted too by his unrequited love for the
- man's wife. "Virginians! Who will go with me!" he cries, rushing
- to his gallant doom.
- </p>
- <p> All these performances are touched with a sense of rue, a sense
- of lives caught up in forces they cannot master. This, together
- with our knowledge of the dreadful cost of the battle, lends
- a terrible poignancy to the film. The fact that Maxwell struggled
- for a decade to realize the project (even mortgaging his home
- to retain the rights to Michael Shaara's Pulitzer-prizewinning
- novel, The Killer Angels, on which he based his screenplay)
- lends a certain critical tolerance to one's view of the film,
- which lingers too long over the preparations for engagement,
- contains perhaps too many couriers galloping up with exposition
- and concludes with a battle that is handled rather distantly
- and bloodlessly. These flaws, though, are minor compared with
- the acuity of the film's best characterizations, the vaulting
- scale of its design and, above all, its old-fashioned belief
- that history, besides being instructive in itself, can--and
- should--be a great movie subject.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-